I have memories of sitting on the couch and watching this game show with my grandmother as a child in the mid-sixties. The objective of the game was for the panelists to ask questions and vote for which contestant was telling the truth. The more the contestants fooled the panelists, the more prize money they got. Seems corny now.
Fast forward over a half-century later. The contestants on stage now are the FDA, CDC, NIAID, NIH, WHO, governments, and the news and social media, etc. The panelists are the people of the world. Like the game show, are we being fooled or are we being told the truth about COVID? This is not fun and games but a matter of life and death. It's not corny anymore.
Dr. Jessica Rose, just judging from the number of alphabets behind her name, appears well-qualified to address the COVID issue. She has a B.S. in Applied Mathematics, M.S. in Immunology, Ph.D. in Computational Biology, and a Post-Doctorate in Molecular Biology. According to a study she co-authored, she found that young males in particular, have a much greater chance of getting myocarditis (inflammation of the heart muscle) as a result of being vaccinated against COVID compared to getting myocarditis as a result of having COVID.
The most prevalent finding was that 19x above background rate, myocarditis was seen in children, aged 12-15. And this is striking...if it was 5x it would still be crazy but 19x, that's not something you can ignore and the CDC and the FDA didn't, but they underwrote it. They didn't take it seriously enough and they're still kinda brushing it aside as a nonissue.
So, the takeaway is children who have a very low risk of contracting covid-19 in the first place, have a high risk of developing myocarditis after being vaccinated, particularly for those 12-15 years old. Why do the authorities ignore these findings at worst or minimize them at best, while still urging you to vaccinate your children?
The peer-reviewed study referred to, which she co-authored with Dr. Peter McCullough, was published in Current Problems in Cardiology on October 1, 2021. However, on October 17, the article was stamped “TEMPORARY REMOVAL” without any explanation.
Dr. Rose's reaction, as told to Retraction Watch:
We are very motivated to get the information in our paper to the public: pediatricians, parents and policy-makers alike. This is why we decided to publish in the first place. It is extremely frustrating for us to face such censorship when professionals are in need of scientific data and discourse on the subject of myocarditis in children in these very strange times.
Despite their findings, Rose and McCullough have been informed that their paper is permanently removed with no explanation given.
Their study now only exists in an archived format which can be found here:
Short interviews with Dr. Rose:
A more extensive interview with Dr. Rose found within this link:
To Tell the Truth:
Follow the Silence or Follow the Science?
Dr. McCullough stated that they will be pursuing a lawsuit against Elsevier.
Elsevier is illegally attempting to censor this paper right at the moment that it's needed most when a vaccine manufacturer is going to the U.S. FDA in seeking approval for emergency vaccination of children aged 5-11.
Elsevier, the world's largest medical publisher now will be engaged and named in a lawsuit... I can't imagine the amount of negative press that Elsevier will receive with this overt act of censorship that's timed perfectly to try to influence a decision regarding vaccination in children particularly when the data indicate that children will be harmed by the vaccine more than they will be helped.