There are those in the minority who questioned the claims of their governments and big pharma at the outset of Covid-19. The vast majority including physicians, however, went along with what they were told as to the nature of the outbreak and the only solution being vaccination. As it turns out, some who initially went along with what they were told are now experiencing a change of mind.
Dr. Joseph Fraiman is an emergency medicine physician in New Orleans, Louisiana. Dr. Fraiman earned his medical degree from Weill Cornell Medical College in New York, NY, and completed his training at Louisiana State University, where he served as Chief Resident as well as Chairman of both the Cardiac Arrest Committee and the Pulmonary Embolism Committee. In addition, he is the lead author of a peer-reviewed study seen here that called for full transparency of the COVID-19 vaccine clinical trial data needed to properly evaluate the Pfizer and Moderna mRNA COVID-19 vaccines which his study found were associated with an excess risk of serious adverse events. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264410X22010283?via%3Dihub
Since the study's publication, Fraiman cited new evidence from the FDA showing that the messenger RNAs were associated with the same adverse events as found in his study. He also referred to autopsy studies that he asserts provide conclusive evidence that the vaccines are responsible for inducing sudden cardiac deaths. Based on these factors, Dr. Fraiman has had a change of mind.
I believe given the information, the messenger RNA vaccines need to be withdrawn from the market until new randomized control trials can clearly demonstrate the benefits of the vaccine outweigh the serious harm we now know the vaccines are causing.
As a result of his change of mind in which he once considered vaccination a necessity, he's recanted and publically apologized.
Dr. Fraiman's full apology to those with whom he initially disagreed can be seen here at the 1:09 mark within the context of the panel discussion presented in its entirety.
Angus Dalgleish, Professor of Oncology at St. Georges Hospital Medical School London has noticed an increase in relapses among his formerly stable skin cancer patients who took the Covid-19 booster shot resulting in more aggressive cancers. As a result of his clinical experience, he recommends not taking the booster vaccine. Other doctors in the UK are also calling for the suspension of the Covid mRNA injection as well.
Well, what do we have here?
Even the FDA advisory committee has doubts about the booster. Since the FDA advisors who are charged with making recommendations have doubts based on "lack of transparency" otherwise known as withholding or shading the truth by Moderna in particular, shouldn't you also have doubts? Why would you trust vaccine manufacturers who are not liable for damages resulting from vaccine-induced injury or death in the first place?
Among the hundreds of participants who received the original vaccine and showed no evidence of a prior Covid-19 infection, over the period of the small study, 1.9% became infected. Among the hundreds who received the new bivalent vaccine, a higher percentage, 3.2%, became infected. The preprint did not indicate whether these findings were statistically significant.
"It shook my faith"
“This was not acceptable. I understand we’re in the middle of a pandemic. I understand we’re building the plane while it’s still in the air, but you can’t do this,” he said. “It did shake my faith. It shook my faith in how these decisions were being made.”
And What About the CDC?
It's not common for a government agency to question its own decisions, particularly when such decisions are already widely known and have far-reaching impacts on the public. So it comes as somewhat of a surprise that the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention is purportedly reviewing the safety of the Covid-19 injection when they initially proclaimed it to be safe and effective. Though the CDC claims that the benefits of being vaccinated still outweigh the risks, the mere fact that they're having second thoughts about the possibility of vaccine-related injuries should cause one to pause and reconsider what we've already been told.